Poland Targets Google Over News Publisher Compensation
UOKiK alleges the tech giant withheld mandatory data needed to calculate licensing fees under EU copyright rules.

Poland’s antitrust authority has accused Alphabet’s Google of violating national media compensation laws by withholding data required for negotiating payments to local news publishers. The Office of Competition and Consumer Protection, known as UOKiK, alleges the search giant exploited its dominant market position across Google Search, Google News, and Google Discover to bypass transparency obligations.
The financial exposure is substantial. UOKiK President Tomasz Chróstny confirmed the agency could impose a fine reaching 10 percent of Google’s annual global revenue. Alphabet reported approximately $350 billion in total revenue for 2024, meaning a maximum penalty could theoretically approach $35 billion, though European regulators rarely levy fines at the absolute statutory ceiling.
The dispute centers on Poland’s implementation of the European Union’s Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market. Adopted in 2019 and transposed into Polish law, the directive grants press publishers a neighboring right over their digital content. Tech platforms must negotiate licensing agreements before displaying article snippets, headlines, or thumbnails. Crucially, the Polish statute mandates that platforms share specific traffic, usage, and monetization metrics with publishers so both parties can calculate fair remuneration. UOKiK asserts Google failed to provide this required information, effectively preventing publishers from determining what they are owed.
This enforcement action reflects a widening regulatory front against major technology companies operating in Europe. The European Commission previously opened an antitrust investigation examining whether Google offered appropriate compensation for journalistic content integrated into its AI Overview and AI Mode features. Those tools synthesize search results into direct answers, raising concerns among publishers that AI-generated summaries reduce click-through traffic while still relying on proprietary reporting.
Polish regulators have scrutinized other Silicon Valley firms under similar competition frameworks. UOKiK previously accused Apple of leveraging its App Tracking Transparency feature to distort competition in the personalized advertising market, arguing the privacy tool disproportionately harmed third-party developers while insulating Apple’s own ad business.
Unlike copyright infringement lawsuits filed by individual media organizations, UOKiK’s intervention treats the lack of data sharing as an abuse of market dominance under Polish competition law. This shifts the legal battleground from intellectual property courts to antitrust authorities, which possess broader investigative powers and significantly higher fining capabilities.
Google has not yet issued a public response to the UOKiK allegations.











